Job Burnout vs. Job Satisfaction

OUTPUT

> APA: LINEAR REGRESSION

>A bivariate regression was conducted to examine how well Burnout could predict job satisfaction. A scatterplot showed that the relationship between burnout and job satisfaction was negative and linear and did not reveal any bivariate outliers. The correlation between burnout and job satisfaction was statistically significant, r(000)=.00, p<.000. The regression equation for predicting job satisfaction from burnout was y ̂ = 78.386

>-.567(x). The r^2 for this equation was .164; that is, 16.4% of the variance in job station was predictable from the level of burnout. This is a moderately strong relationship (Cohen, 1998). The bootstrapped 95% confidence interval* for the slope to predict job satisfaction from burnout ranges from -0.00 to -0.00; thus, for each unit of burnout increase, job satisfaction decreases by about 1.8 to 2.5 points.

>

GGraph


Notes


Output Created

18-JUL-2024 22:11:43

Comments


Input

Data

/Users/carlosvilladiego/ Downloads/job_satisfacti on.sav

Active Dataset

DataSet1

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

218

Syntax

GGRAPH

/GRAPHDATASET

NAME="graphdataset" VARIABLES=Burnout Satisfaction MISSING=LISTWISE REPORTMISSING=NO

/GRAPHSPEC SOURCE=INLINE

/FITLINE TOTAL=NO SUBGROUP=NO. BEGIN GPL

GUIDE: axis(dim(1), label("Burnout")) GUIDE: axis(dim(2), label("Satisfaction")) GUIDE: text.title(label ("Scatter Plot of

Satisfaction by Burnout"))

ELEMENT: point (position (Burnout*Satisfaction)) END GPL.

Resources

Processor Time

00:00:01.02

Elapsed Time

00:00:01.00


[DataSet1] /Users/carlosvilladiego/Downloads/job_satisfaction.sav

Scatter Plot of Satisfaction by Burnout

image

y=78.39-0.57*x

R2 Linear = 0.164


90


80


Satisfaction

70


60


50


40


30

0 10


20 30 40 50


Burnout


Regression


Notes


Output Created

18-JUL-2024 22:23:01

Comments


Input

Data

/Users/carlosvilladiego/ Downloads/job_satisfacti on.sav

Active Dataset

DataSet1

Filter

<none>

Weight

<none>

Split File

<none>

N of Rows in Working Data File

218

Missing Value Handling

Definition of Missing

User-defined missing values are treated as missing.

Cases Used

Statistics are based on cases with no missing values for any variable used.

Notes


Syntax

REGRESSION

/DESCRIPTIVES MEAN STDDEV CORR SIG N

/MISSING LISTWISE

/STATISTICS COEFF OUTS CI(95) R ANOVA

/CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10) TOLERANCE(. 0001)

/NOORIGIN

/DEPENDENT

Satisfaction

/METHOD=ENTER

Burnout

/SCATTERPLOT= (*ZRESID ,*ZPRED)

/RESIDUALS DURBIN HISTOGRAM(ZRESID) NORMPROB(ZRESID)

/CASEWISE PLOT (ZRESID) OUTLIERS(3).

Resources

Processor Time

00:00:00.62

Elapsed Time

00:00:01.00

Memory Required

3328 bytes

Additional Memory Required for Residual Plots

896 bytes


Descriptive Statistics


Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Satisfaction

66.16

8.825

218

Burnout

21.57

6.305

218


Correlations


Satisfaction

Burnout

Pearson Correlation

Satisfaction

1.000

-.405

Burnout

-.405

1.000

Sig. (1-tailed)

Satisfaction

.

<.001

Burnout

.000

.

N

Satisfaction

218

218

Burnout

218

218

Variables Entered/Removeda


Variables

Model Entered

Variables Removed

Method

1

Burnoutb

.

Enter

  1. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction

  2. All requested variables entered.


Model Summaryb



Model R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

Durbin-Watson

1

.405a

.164

.160

8.088

2.009

  1. Predictors: (Constant), Burnout

  2. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction


ANOVAa



Model Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

2771.029

1

2771.029

42.359

<.00 1b

Residual

14130.351

216

65.418



Total

16901.381

217




  1. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction

  2. Predictors: (Constant), Burnout


Coefficientsa



Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

Beta


t


Sig.

Model B

Std. Error

1

(Constant)

78.386

1.957


40.062

<.001

Burnout

-.567

.087

-.405

-6.508

<.001

image

-.395

-.738

82.242

74.529

Coefficientsa



Model

1 (Constant) Burnout

95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Bound Upper Bound

  1. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction

Casewise Diagnosticsa



Case Number Std. Residual

Satisfaction

Predicted Value

Residual

97

-3.118

39

64.22

-25.216

217

4.128

84

50.61

33.387

  1. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction


Residuals Statisticsa


Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

50.61

73.85

66.16

3.573

218

Residual

-25.216

33.387

.000

8.069

218

Std. Predicted Value

-4.351

2.152

.000

1.000

218

Std. Residual

-3.118

4.128

.000

.998

218

  1. Dependent Variable: Satisfaction


Charts


Histogram Dependent Variable: Satisfaction


image

Mean = 7.91E-16

60 Std. Dev. = 0.998

N = 218


50


Frequency

40


30


20


10


0

- 4 - 2 0


2 4 6

Regression Standardized Residual

Normal P-P Plot of Regression Standardized Residual

Dependent Variable: Satisfaction

image

1.0


Expected Cum Prob

0.8


0.6


0.4


0.2


0.0

0.0


0.2


0.4


0.6


0.8


1.0

Observed Cum Prob


image

Scatterplot Dependent Variable: Satisfaction

Regression Standardized Residual

6


4


2


0


- 2


- 4


- 4 - 2 0 2

Regression Standardized Predicted Value